A federal court has upheld the City of West Hollywoods municipal prohibition on the sale of animal fur apparel. Chief Judge George H. King wrote the opinion for the United States District Court for the Central District of California, dismissing a constitutional challenge filed by a retailer to the ordinance.
King wrote that West Hollywoods intent to promote community awareness of animal welfare, foster the Citys goal to be a community that cares about animal welfare, and further the Citys reputation as Cruelty Free Zone for animals by prohibiting fur sales was a legitimate interest, rejecting claims that the ban was unconstitutional.
The opinion cited an amicus curiae brief filed by The Humane Society of the United States in support of West Hollywood. Ralph Henry, deputy director for The HSUS Animal Protection Litigation Group, issued the following statement in response:
West Hollywood is one of the nations most animal-friendly cities a notion thats just incompatible with the inhumane treatment of fur-bearing animals. We applaud the Courts decision to uphold the Citys groundbreaking ordinance. The ruling makes clear that the Constitution does not prevent West Hollywood or any other city from using its lawmaking powers to protect animals by prohibiting the sale of cruelly-produced products.
The Humane Society of the United States is the nations largest animal protection organization, rated most effective by our peers. For 60 years, we have celebrated the protection of all animals and confronted all forms of cruelty. We are the nations largest provider of hands-on services for animals, caring for more than 100,000 animals each year, and we prevent cruelty to millions more through our advocacy campaigns. Read more about our 60 years of transformational change for animals, and visit us online at humanesociety.org.